by Michael Butler on July 5, 2021

Maria Staking Plan in Sports Betting – Crash Course

Naturally, many punters are interested in a strategy that will bring solid winnings or help them avoid massive losses. One of such strategies is Maria Staking Plan. It is used today in the game against crypto bookmakers. This strategy is of interest since it is focused on working out at fairly high odds. Most financial algorithms are tailored to the classic range of odds from 1.50 to 2.00 or a little more. There are also various schemes for wagering at small odds. But with the mechanics for working out large indicators, there is tension. So for those interested in playing at high odds, this plan may be relevant.

Like any other strategy, “Maria’s Plan” requires players to properly allocate finances and endurance. Regardless of the results, it is not advised to make adjustments at a distance. Otherwise, the balance will be upset, which can lead to serious consequences. In some ways, this strategy is reminiscent of rates on “fixed interest”. The difference is that Maria Staking Plans provides for a review of the size of the bet after each playing day. If you manage to increase the bank, the percentage remains the same. But the amount for which transactions will be concluded will grow. With minimal losses (no more than 35%), the bet size does not change either. So, if in the first category we bet 1% ($10), then with a conditional balance of $800, the next day the rates will also be for $10 instead of $8.

Maria Staking Plan – Essence of the Strategy

The essence of the algorithm is that the amount of bets placed depends on the size of the odds. The higher they are, the lower the percentage they play. There are three ranges of odds:

  • The first group – Odds up to 3.50. This also includes classic bets on indicators around 2.00. These values ​​are set at 1% of the bank. At the start, Maria put down, respectively, $ 30;
  • The second group – odds ranging from 3.60 to 7.40. These values ​​are bet 0.6% each, or in the case of a specific example: $18;
  • The third group – Odds from 7.50 to 11.00. Here the size of the rates is 0.4% or $ 12.

Odds above 11.00 are not used. You can flirt with larger quotes, but this will already be a gamble. At the same time, no one says that there will be no chances to win. It’s just that Maria didn’t do it.

The second important nuance of the plan is the cutoff of the recalculation of interest by day. We know that in the classic “percentage of the bank” scheme, the rates are recalculated after each full turnover of the deposit. Miller’s scheme assumes recalculation after reaching a gain of + 25%. In Maria Staking Plan the recount is daily.

If the bank has grown by the end of the day, then the recalculation takes place and the next day, at the same interest rates, the sums of calls increase. If the bank has dipped, but by no more than 35%, then the size of the rates is not recalculated and remains the same in absolute terms. In the case of a starting bank of $3,000, this cut-off amount is $1,950. If the deposit sags more than 35%, then the same percentage is recalculated. For example, if the deposit remains at $1,500, then 1% will be $15. Thus, they play until the pot is brought up to its original size. To accelerate growth, recalculate again every day until the original deposit is returned.


The most piquant moment of working out “Maria’s Plan” is the selection of events for high odds, which are actively exploited here. While there are no special problems with the first group, many questions arise with the odds from 3.50. Here you have to use:

  • Big negative handicaps: (-1.5), (-2), (-2.5);
  • Serious totals: Under Total (1.5), Over Total (3.5), Over Total (4);
  • Significant individual totals: Individual Over Totals (2), Individual Over Totals (2.5);
  • Totals and outcomes by half;
  • Various double bets: outcome plus total, outcome plus both scores.

The use of bets on the exact number of goals, on a specific score, on player goals are also options with suitable odds, but their mathematical expectation is too weak and it is hardly possible to count on remote success with them.

Maria Staking Plan – Pros and Cons

Like all sports betting strategies at bookmakers, Maria’s Plan has positive and negative sides. The main advantage is proof that discipline, coupled with luck, can bring real dividends, but not bad ones.


  • A simple algorithm of behavior for different scenarios of the development of the game.
  • Minimal risk of fast bank emptying.
  • You can count on making a profit even with a low percentage of winning bets.


  • The bankroll does not grow as rapidly as many punters want;
  • The higher the quotes, the greater the risks.


The fact that “Maria’s Plan” helped a particular player to spin the bank so well is far from a guarantee that it will be possible to repeat it. As usual, the level of analytics and the quality of the game strategies that are used play a huge role. In general, the allowable odds are too high here, which makes this plan openly adventurous. On the other hand, at least such a financial plan is better than none. It is known that the bulk of bettors is in the red, precisely because of the lack of any financial strategy and discipline. So if there are ideas for taking high odds, and they come in with good cross-country ability, you can use the considered scheme.

The Maria Plan sports betting strategy has stood the test of time. Many punters have approved it and have been using it for years in battles with bookmakers. Someone benefits from it, someone is marking time, but there are forecasters for whom this tactic is unprofitable. Everything here is individual and depends solely on the players themselves. It should always be remembered that there are no win-win strategies in betting, and you need to be prepared for anything. Only if you adhere to the chosen methodology, while showing endurance, you can count on success. Always determine your bankroll in advance and make clever bets – not the ones that are purely driven by emotions.

By Michael Butler

Michael Butler

Michael is our Sportsbook expert. He knows the ins and outs of the industry as he has been working in this field for nearly a decade. This is why he knows very nuanced details of sportsbooks. Michael has seen the effects that the rise of the cryptocurrency market had on sportsbooks firsthand. His experience gives him an undeniable advantage as he has objective views on many betting-related topics and is ahead of the rising trends.

More content by Michael Butler

Comments (0 comment(s))